Sunday, February 12, 2017

Interests and skills instead of power

"120. People's skill levels affect how many things they can well do at the same time and how quickly they get those things done and how well they succeed in them. The slow witted typically do something else at the same time, so they need lots of concentration and many attempts to succeed in even ordinary tasks, for example they think of food in the stomach or keep their body very rigidly.
For one to learn skills, one needs to pay attention to what was the idea in that skills, what it consists of and which ways of doing are best suited for it. The most slow learning try to copy via sexuality or acting or by keepin g company, very détailedly the social atmosphere of the more skilled one, but that just disturbs skills. Instead one should keep a longer distance and watck detailedly what the skilled one does, and do those things oneself, without being overly close. About problems that the wise do not usually fall into, teh less skilled have no right to demand the skilled to be models of how to fall into them and then rise again, but instead the less skilled should heed advices about the subject, usually ordinary basic advices about the subject and about those kind of things in the world and about life generally, since biggest problems have to be avoided in advance, always.
Typically people do only a few thinsg at a time. For example if someone sing, they think of the song's atmosphere, of music, of not disturbing neighbours, of music hobbies and of wisdom of songs. So they are kind of concentrated to music subject. So if one is interested in who should have power over what, one can via the rule "Live and let others live", i.e. It is ok to be selfish in ways positive for happy life but not to disturb the lives of others, one can with the help of this rule say that the person singing usually, almost always, ought to be allowed to sing. But on the other hand not to interfere in affairs that he/she is not just now taking care of. Similarly with other subjects. It is ok to care for them, in ways piositive for happy life in the society and in the world, but not to disturb such possibilities, which must be estimated wisely. For example someone may build possibilities for music hobbies, that is often a job or a hobby in music. Likewise in other subjects: the skilled one who value it take care of it. On the other hand the stupid usually should be allowed to do things by themselves to learn about life and skill but not to mess with the lives of others or the affairs of the society. So it often seems that there is no question of power unless there is someone with too little skill or not valuing the things in question enough, messing along. So the question of power seems to connect to family emebers influencing things because they are close to a person who values such things in life. Otherwise, and maybe even in family relations, things are quite clear with the rule "Live and let others live"."

Friday, February 3, 2017

About armies' looks

The leadership of Finnish army has often or traditionally been Swedish. That is absurd, since Finns have negotiation skills well suited for Finns, so a more peaceful result would have been to have an all-Finnish leadership of Finnish army. Finnish men also copy army like ways. It is absurd for them to copy Swedish style since their own skills are Finnish and well suited for just Finnish life and Finnish ways of handliung things. It is generally important to look roughly with the same kind of understanding and the same level of intelligence as one really honesty has, because so all others all the time talk in ways that you can well understand and they talk to your own motivation, so you learn all the time and benefit greatly. If you are skilled, it is nice to get respect and position that you fairly deserve. If you are not at all skilled but don't lie to be any more skilled than you really are, you learn all the time, and you do not look like a betrayal but like a good honest attempt in things that others too value. More stupid ones are often with more basic questions of life, so others kind of find them symphatetical. There are different levels of understanding in each: one is to understand well by oneself and to do on one's own, another is to have read and roughly followed through but not able to think such on one's own even afterwards, and a third is to not to understand but to follow authorities, for example priests. But between nations there are also other differencies: travellers find a different climate, different ways, different ways of being social and running the society, different rythm etc, so they kind of appear more stupid than what they in fact are when they are in their own country.Russians in Siberia copy froma cademical while Asians copy from highly respected masters of different skills, so it may be that Siberians are less intelligent that Asians while they on the other hand have more freedom than the Asians, like more average people typically have compared to highly educated. who do not get likewise followed in their own thughts. People in more eastern countries live the evening while western live the morning or day, so they have more evening like characteristics and appear more thoughtless, more leisurely, more freetime like. Trust is often felt toward the one who is more skilled and responsible, while instictual irrational trust is felt to the opposite direction: toward those who do not take care of things going well at all and so rely on others to take care of things. People in more southern and warmer areas typically confuse northern people to be like people in cooled indoors or like their own countrymen who have travelled to the cooler  or colder countries but who are not adapted to the northern climate.If you do a service to other countries in a way typical to your own country's culture, then others learn or otherwise benefit from it and so they are more in tune with your own culture, with it's ways, and so your culture has gained more influence in the world, in a way that it fairly deserves.

Thursday, February 2, 2017

African lack of moral

African weather brings short-sightedness if one is not skilled in living with the heat. One things which affects a lot is what kind of food one eats and when. As far as I know, a good type of meal fitted for living wisely with the weathers, helps already even once a month but much more if eaten daily. At least in Finnish climate a meal of fish, rise and cooked vegetables brings a better touch of living wisely with the weathers. The Finnish climate is very different, almost arctic, but summer time daytime temperatures on hot days may rise to as high as roughly 30C, so just in case that it helps abroad, Finnish advices about living wisely the summer:

Often people are short-sigheted when their professional and other forefigures are much less intelligent than they are. So finding widely more skilled forefigures would help a lot. For example small wild birds may be more intelligent tahn apes and some apes more intelligent and farseeing than other apes.
In addition one needs civilized wisdom about what is a good way to live in a society, see and and about healthy ways of living and wisdom of life .
Intelligece one can learn from my blogs and plus from video playlists at .

* * *
(I was left wondering about African meals. Could one try different dishes and find out what makes one feel well and how often it is good to eat so in the local climate and with some type of activity & strain during the day? Would an evening snack of some fresh vegetables sallad, (maybe  a wineberry(??)) and a piece of a Carelian pie make one sleep well?)

Sunday, January 29, 2017

About trying to guide people toward moral

It often happens for beginners who know only one approach to some questions in life, that they try to force others into accepting thier own views. But there are many areas of life. As people get more experience in life, they learn skills and talents in new areas of life from those who have such skills as their hobby or job. So they often have many approaches available fro each type of question. And so, if one tries to force them to one answer, they often resist, thinking that their own answer is better suited for them. So what is moral and what is not is a question that needs skills, open-mindedness toward other kinds of answers and a view of how the society works and what is needed in the society for things to turen out well. So an idea of who is how skilled in which areas of life, could settle disputes about whom to aloow freedoms and whom to allow decides for the group. Often varied answers by different people offer a well working choise for the group.

When someone errs to oppose moral quite strongly, it often is a questions of what is nonsese and what is not or of what was forcing, what was ordinary talk and what was mildly refusing to have an opinion. For suc too a better idea about who is how skilled in what, wouldgive better working communication. ( ). About how much one can command and what is too far going, to that works well the rule "Live and let others live!" i.e. it is ok for all to be selfish in ways positive for happy life but not to mess with the lives of others, except fairly. One must demand this rule also toward and between others and not just with you with the person you conversate with. See . In the same blog also about healthy ways of living: If your suggestions is not good in some respect, it likely gets opposed, but if it works well for all, it is much more likely to be accepted and supported.

People who are considered to be with a lack of understanding, often confuse adices from different sources, kind of one talking one way of talking and another with another way of talking and other subjects too but they confuse them to be the same things and so produce nonsense from which they are blaimed. Relying more in common sense would help. One shoudl also pay somewhat more attention to who said the thing in question, not to memorize it as words only but as something said by someone specialized in certain area of life and with certain ways of thinking and level of skill in such and certain level of skill in other things. So the things said have only so much understanding and only about certain areas of life. What someone else said was with a certain leel of success in that area of life and certain amount of certainty in things at large. So please keep these things in your mind too as a landcspe, and your own understanding, the things at hand etc, and not just the words said.

People adapt to the culture and climate they were raised in, so that even abroad they tend to suggest that things should be guided like they were guided in their original homeland and culture. So if some Arab or whoever seems dangerously out of control and criminal, should one check if she/he is from another continent than you thought her/him to be from?Like Arab maybe African, some work oriented from Asia, etc.

Often especially young people confuse their environment talking about their own interests and values and about the importance of their place in the world, into believing that they themselves should invest in just those skills and areas of life even at the cost of their own profession and values. But it is not so. People just need to express their iews about things they like and value. It is not an obligation fro others, it is not even advice since it supposes that you are similarly inclined person. The rule "Live and let others live!" gives you room to follow your own likings even if others do not agree about their value.

Wednesday, January 18, 2017


In Finland sexuality is a love affair: people choose freely whom they love and with whom they want to get married and start a family. They also choose freely is they do not want to associate with someone or be sexual with someone. That is good life and makes things work out well. The rule "Live and let others live!" (which means that it is ok to be selfish but not to mess with the lives of others, except fairly interfering with others is ok) makes things work out well and gives freedom.

But in some other countruies people either aren't so free, so skilled, they have a different view on love in their enviroment, or they do not have enough contacts. So they end up with less good arrangements which though are said to have the good sides of love affairs.

Tuesday, January 17, 2017

Dark or light?

As one via age  learns new skills, one first as a kid becomes a member of the adult's world, then later  truly a part of it, then somewhat too skilled for some tasks, then too skilled for many to communicate with, then not understood. Likewise one learns to solve problems in life and of the world, and so later on one has more answers and more skilled style, but less understood anymore. So at first one maybe were for tough realism as a kid, kind of dark, then later average, then light, then out of sight, then dark or light or whatever when one part of the time succeeds in communicating answers found and part of the time is too different to be understood right. So from communication one changes to out of tune but full of answers - finds religion, art, upbringing of the next generation, etc.

On the other hand some try to start from the difficult end and so they lack quality, kind of full of lies. Or someone skilled loses touch with daily chores and so loses basic skills which bring quality. And both gorups some tend to encourage to tasks which require great skill. So it goes ashtray.

All people may have the same building parts, kind of rational, kind of caring for things they consider impirtant. But all do not stick to the level they know well and care about, but mess with the wider world, and so things go ashtray. Or they are social unobjectively in questions that should be parts of the society, of civilized ways and not of social life and personal choises.

Sunday, October 9, 2016

Moraali käy yli sairaiden yms hoitamisen oikeuden * Moralis more important than nursing

Minua ihmetyttää tuo, onko hoitoalojen ammattilaisille, poliisille ym ihmisille selvä tuo, että mitä moraali sanoo siitä, kuka saa hoitaa ketä ja että mitä saa määrätä ja mitä ei. Yleensä kai hoitoalan ihminen haluaisi mielellään hoitaa jotakin presidentin tapaista esim. henkilöä, jolla on jokin virka, taito tai vaikutusvalta, ja ajattelisi siitä saavansa etua itselleen, lähinnä vaikutusvaltaa ja rahallista hyötyä kai ja pelottelumahdollisuuden. Mutta moraalin näkövinkkelistä on niin, että kullakin ihmisellä on vastuuntuntonsa määrä, miten laajalti kantaa asioista ja ihmisistä vastuuta, ja mikä taas jää tuon yksilön vastuuntuntoisuuden ulkopuolelle, huolehtimatta, sekä lisäksi on taitojen määrä, esim. ymmärrys ja taidot kullakin elämänalueella sekä havaintokyky ja havaintovarmuus sen osana. Hoitohenkilökunta ei saisi päättää mistään laajemmasta kuin mistä kantaa vastuuta, siis esim. vain hoitotyöstä vastuuta kantava ei saisi päättää presidentin tai muunkaan itseään laajemmalti vastuuta kantavan asioista mitään, vaan vastuuntuntoisen olisi itse saatav päättää kaikki, jottei vaikutuksia mihinkään laajempiin kysymyksiin tulisi ties miten pahaatekeviltä tai huolehdittavat asiat hunningolle jättäviltä. Yleensä se, joka ei ole kiinnostunut jostakin aiheesta, teloo sen kuin tökerö pahoipitelijä, jos siihen puuttuu, kuin mikä lie huonontyyppinen diktaattori, jonka käsissä maan asiat menevät huonosti. Sen sijaan henkilö, joka huolehtii jostakin alueesta hyvin, yleensä antaa sen ihmisten olla ihan vapaasti, järjestääpähän vain jonkin tervehenkisesti toiumivan kätevän avun johonkin yleisesti toivottuun hyväätekevään.

Se, että joku on hierargiassa korkealla ei merkitse, ettei hänen kanssaan noudatettaisi mitään pelisääntöjä, vaan heidänkin kanssaan on oltava moraalinen ja tervejärkinen sekä tervehenkinen.
Esim. jos joku on moraalisempi kuin mitä laki edellyttäisi ja hyvällä ymmärryksellä varustettu, niin ehkä joku sanoo hänen olevan lain yläpuolella mutta se siis merkitsee, että hänen kanssaan noudatetaan lakia täydesti paitsi ehkä joustetaan siitä moraalisempaan suuntaan.

* * *
engl. translation

I am puzzled about whether people working in medicine or in nursing kidn of work, and whether police and  other peoole have been made clear what moral says about who is allowed to nurse whom and what one is allowed to command and what not. Usually people in nursing type of work would like to nurse someone like a president, who has some job position, skill or influence, and they would think taht nursing such would give them benefit, mainly influence and money benefit and propably also the ability to scare people, threaten them. But moral says that each individual has one's own amount of carrying responsibility about people and things, and what is left outside that area, not taken care of, and in addition an amount of skills, for example understanding and skills on each area of life and perception ability and how sure it is. Those in nursing type of professions should not be allowed to decide anything larger, anything more important or wider than what they themselves carry responsibility over, so for example a person caring only about nursing should not decide anything about a president or anyone else carrying wider responsibility than she herself / he himself, instead those who carry responsibility should be allowed to decide everything so as to avoid influences from evil people and from irresponsible people. Usually a person who is not interested in some subject, breaks it like as if in a fight, if one interferes with it, like a poor dictator that ruins one's country. Instead a person who cares well for some area, usually lets those people live freely and just arranges some needed generally wanted moral thing in healthy well working ways.

Someone being high in a hierargy does not mean that one should not follow any rules of game with him /her, instead with him/her one needs to behave morally and according to common sense with a picture of the whole and with healthy spirit. For example if someone is more moral than what law requires and with a good understanding, maybe someone says that he/she is above the law, but it means that with him/her one should also follow law fully but maybe be inclined to even more moral behaviour than the law is.

When there is some common sense lacking in the laws or some big problem needing correcting, correcting those may in common sense like ways like is fair go above the laws.
In Finland there is the saying "Emergency does not read the law." meaning that you can for example steal something not so important in order to help someone in an emergency.